Specializing in bringing together all components necessary for long term business growth,
profitability and success; and ensuring
that they are working in harmony.

Posts Tagged ‘corporate mindset’

WHERE’S THE REST?

Monday, September 8th, 2014

It is no wonder that McDonald’s and the like continue to lose market share. Several days ago I thought I would grab a quick bite to hold me over until dinner. Typical of previous experiences, I was greeted by a barrage of irritating beepers and buzzers reminding the employees of various tasked that needed to be tended to. “Why don’t they use chimes or even more pleasant sounding bells I asked?”   “They want it to gnaw on our nerves the counter person replied as he shrugged his shoulders.”

I went ahead and ordered a chicken sandwich. When I sat down to bite into it, I discovered that there was not much there – just two buns, a slab of deep fried chicken breast and a pickle. When I brought it back to the counter and requested that they please add tomato and lettuce, and “hey, how ‘bout some mayonnaise? “He returned with it (now dressed as I had originally anticipated and then said “.30 cents please?”

Years ago the famous add for a competing chain had the little old lady asking “where’s the beef!?” Today, we are asking, “where’s the rest?!”

Between beepers, buzzers and substance-less sandwiches, I’m not planning to return anytime soon.

John Russell, the Principal of the Russell Consulting Group  seeks solutions for companies interested in retaining or growing market share with a combination of common sense corporate and management decisions intended to improving brand awareness.

Outing naughty and irresponsible ads during cold and flu season

Wednesday, December 18th, 2013

Tylenol

It is time to out a couple of irresponsible ads from the makers of Tylenol and Alka Seltzer.

The woman stands in the middle of a library and surrounded by patrons as she looks sadly up to the camera. Her nose is so raw from her nasty cold that the viewer is almost tempted to offer her another Kleenex. She exclaims how miserable she is with her cold and congestion. Of course the undercurrent message is that if you have to come into work, and then at least be reasonably comfortable (as you infect everyone else with your nasty illness.)

Equally offensive is the sick mother in the Tylenol ad. After it is established how ill feels, she just takes some Tylenol for colds and flu and Walla! –  She is back to entertaining her children! However the real rub is when she high fives her young child. So let me get this straight, if you take Tylenol you are no longer contagious?

Still, another ad uncomfortably places a woman in the middle seat of an airplane. Logged between two unfortunate souls, she will take the medicine so she feels better during the flight. Never mind that by the time they land, those poor passengers have just had their trips ruined because no doubt they were infected by whatever ailed her!

It is time that the cold and flu people get the message: Stop encouraging irresponsible behavior when people are sick! Rather than the woman sitting in the library – infecting everyone around her (yes, she will also no doubt be touching books and keyboards) why not try a more contemporary and responsible approach.

Perhaps her boss could be offering her a bottle of Alka Seltzer as he ushers her out the door to go home and get some rest. She might even be holding a slip of paper which reads, “Authorized paid sick leave!”

Taking this approach encourages responsible company policy and common sense. In the long-run, we all know (and the facts support it) that when people don’t come to work sick then business actually lose less money in the long run.

As for the mom in the Tylenol ad, how about a similar gesture instead of actual hand to hand contact. Perhaps the voice-over might say, “Though taking Tylenol when you are sick may greatly diminish cold and flu symptoms, you should still avoid contact with others ….”

Finally, don’t even put a sick passenger on a plane – not even for an ad, the risk are simply too great!

It is time that the cold and flu people get the message: Stop encouraging irresponsible behavior when people are sick!Alka-seltzer

However, “we have streamline seats!”

Monday, June 3rd, 2013

Recently I spoke to a friend who works with United Airlines about his employer being at the bottom of the list with recent customer satisfaction surveys. “How is it that you guys have the uncanny ability to find yourself at the bottom I asked?”

He began explaining that the merger between United and Continental has been less then harmonious. “They have wiped out large swaths of the United flight crews he began. So most of our team has been on extended furloughs. When we do work, it is fewer hours then before the merger. Our old United hub, which use to service all of the flights to Hawaii have now been cut to one. Flight crews from Continental are carrying out the other flights. So perhaps one of the reasons why they are at the bottom of the list he continued, has more to do with how they treat us. We get a call that we are to be up by 5:00 am so that we can take off for a 7 o’clock round-trip which takes eleven to twelve hours and then by the time we get back are told that we need to plan on getting up again (same time) for a long international flight. So here we are, trying to keep passengers happy while we are IV-ing on coffee to ensure that we don’t end up sleep walking through the trip.”

So much for the happy merger.

“Oh, and it gets worse, he continued, here is a customer service doosie for you, we have been given strict orders from corporate not to let passengers know that if their 4.99 Wi-Fi fails, then they can get a refund. They need to go to the United website to find out about this!”
After listening to him, I then brought up the other news about how the airlines are still squeezing even more seats into coach. In addition, making the toilets smaller.

“Oh, yea, he agreed. But you see, it is all about how it is presented. We call them Streamline Seats!” Sounds sort of nice don’t you think? He asked sarcastically. Of course, there is the standard corporate propaganda that we hear so much of these days about how it is all in the name of saving the earth – you know green? – smaller seats are good because they have less weight and in turn require less fuel.”

He rambled on, sharing his more frustrations where it was easy to conclude that perhaps one of the reasons that they are at the bottom of the heap is a reflection of how they are also treating their staff. This conclusion is an easy to make, and we see it every day where companies that become too big to balance their budgets with the needs of their customers and employees have an uncanny way of hurting their long-term performance.

And regarding the rationale for why seats are smaller, as with other businesses making boxes smaller, or suggesting that your towels at the hotel you are staying at needn’t be refreshed daily – really has less to do with going green (saving the environment) but saving green (money to their bottom line)

GOING UNDERC0VER andThe Value of Critical and Honest Employee Input

Thursday, February 7th, 2013

Without employees who are productive and happy, growing a company will be difficult. This is why I always encourage candid and open dialogue between management and employees. On the same token, it is generally more beneficial to keep a pulse on company morale and direction through an independent third party. This is because it is often difficult to get honest and direct answers from employees on what they really think.

An outside independent party will – take a careful look at your offices, stores or locations to assess how things are running from a professional outside perspective. Then, by earning the trust of key personnel, will be able to successfully troubleshoot areas weakness.
Here are a few Case Examples:

A Deli in Walnut Creek, CA.
Total employees – 73

A onetime popular destination for hungry patrons twenty-six miles east of San Francisco, the small chain of delis was quickly losing market share. “I’m not really sure what the problem is exclaimed the Senior Partner, we used to have line out the door, but now business has dropped off. Can you help us develop a marketing strategy so we can win back our customers?”

“Well sure, I replied, but before we do that, I think it behooves such an investment to focus on what people are currently experiencing first, and identify any problems or deficiencies that give customers a less then delightful experience.”

As with many other similar situations we began with an in-depth customer survey followed by me going under cover. The difference between a Mystery Shopper approach and going under cover is that I play the role of the Mystery Shopper from a specific professional perspective of knowing exactly what I was looking for. And yes, this is a big difference!

• How easy is it to find? How is the signage?
• Is parking adequate, or do I need to worry about door dings?
• What does the place look like? How does it smell? Is there music that compliments the inside ambiance and environment?

1. I walked into the first location to a low vibe environment. “No energy here, I concluded. Why would I want to patronize a place that was boring?”

2. At the next location, I noticed a unpleasant smell and then looking up toward the top right ceiling observed a thick group of cobwebs. “So what else was un kempt?”

3. The third location was equally boring, but at least had no cobwebs. Nor did it have an attentive staff. While I looked at the menu board, the employees busily stared at their phones, one texting while the other seemed fixated on Facebook. “Nothing worse than inattentive employees who don’t acknowledge the customers!”

Taking my notes with me, I set up a series of meetings with various employees in the organization until I was meeting with Hillary, the General Manager. My conversation began with my experience from going under cover.
Thirty minutes after earning the trust of Hillary, the middle aged woman suddenly stopped me by asking, “do you really want to know my opinion, and I mean – my honest opinion?“ “Of course I replied.” She then excused herself and returned with a large folder. “I have been keeping notes on everything that has either happened or has gone wrong with this company for the last six years, but the business owners have not listened, this is why things have gotten so bad around here and why we have not been making any money. Even worse, she continued, this is why it is so difficult to get my people to give a damn! Why bother? Management does not listen or seem to care anyway, so why should the employees?”

We reviewed the file and were able to use it as a toolbox for harvesting valuable information and feedback from other personnel. Much of this confirmed serious management deficiencies. As a result, the argument for recommending changes in policy and protocols was a simple one.

Benefits and Results: The client agreed to consider the changes, which originated in Hillary’s files, thus returning their chain of Delis to profitability. (Sometimes the people in the trenches have a better feel for what needs to be done to be successful then those who actually own the company) I suggested that we give the process several months and see if this will be enough to begin the process for winning back customers. The ad campaign was then designed with a theme of “finding out what has changed!”

Because fundamental issues were resolved between management and employees, major expenditures for adverting were averted. The other realization however, was that the company owners were ready to sell – and retire. Eight months later, this too was carried out after referring them to a competent business broker.

A Tree Service in Austin Texas
Total employees – 35
A small company built and managed by the owner and his GM (brother) had an issue with discernment. The problem was that they were good at what they did, but not necessarily good at reading people. After all, some of the key people that were with the company were friends and relatives. Therefore, it was not always easy for the owner and GM to accept that some staff members were skimping on their responsibilities or worse, had addiction issues that kept them from either coming to work, or performing well when they did.

After interviewing key staff and personnel in the field, it was determined, that three counterproductive office employees and two outside project managers needed to be dismissed.

Benefits and Results – led to the removal of several unproductive employees thus saving the business $15,388.00 per month. More importantly, the office morale increased with an immediate lift of positive attitude and energy. The company environment was saved along with money no longer spent on unsavory or poor performing employees. As an incentive, a portion of the money saved was redistributed into higher salaries for key productive employees as a reward for doing a great job.

A Renovation Contractor in Oakland CA.
Total employees – 86
A fast growing company, with over eighty employees was experiencing an unusually high turnover rate. Fifteen employees were interviewed and an assessment report provided several pages of valid grievances. In addition, we discovered that the employer was in violation of labor laws, thus vulnerable to fines and/or lawsuits by disgruntled personnel.

It was recommended that Company President allow us to conduct an open and candid meeting between himself and his employees and to listen to all the grievances with an open mind. We followed up several weeks later to make sure that company changes – as agreed upon were actually being implemented. We also sought additional improvements and long-terms systems designed to maintain mutual trust between him and his team.

Benefits and Results: Employer immediately implemented changes as required by State Labor Laws. He then authorized policy changes in response to employee grievances, currently affordable along with the promise to add additional employee request, within the coming months.

This engagement dramatically eliminated distrust between management and personnel resulting in a significant drop off in employee turnover (and cost associated with turnover).

In addition, reduced “shop stealing” of tools and equipment by disgruntled employees. In the spirit of cooperation, created protocols and systems, this streamlined day-to-day operations. Implementation of these changes resulted in low turnover, improved customer retention and a solid ten-year averaged growth of 38%.

A Restaurant in Prague, Czech Republic, Europe
Number of employees – 73

In the 1990s as Eastern Europe was celebrating its newfound independence they were also wrestling with how to evolve their business models to adapt to Western business standards. In 1995, I began advising a number of companies in this region on improving their business models so that increased profitability could be reached through a combination of good systems, enhanced management to employee communication and dramatically improved customer service.

One of my favorite clients was a restaurant on Wenceslas Square, in the center of tourist foot traffic and business lunches. They had contacted us because they realized that they were not experiencing the repeat business from business parties and worse – had, on a weekly bases, tourist simply walk out due to lousy service. I met with the business partners and suggested that over the next week I go under cover as a patron. They agreed and for the next several weeks tuned from Business Adviser to Mystery Shopper. True to what I had been told, service was slow and inefficient. By comparison with other restaurants and eateries, the food quality was inconsistent and mediocre – where from time to time, it was great, but generally served lukewarm. As time progressed and I established a rapport with the wait-staff and began conversing with them to find out what from their perspective – “was going wrong?”

“Oh, we just work here, Honza politely replied, but I guess we are not motivated because we are paid little and the tips are lousy.” I looked at the menu and realized that for average lunch items (around $20 US, and dinners starting at $35, then tips should be a lot better than their average return of 2 – 4%. Especially with consideration to the tourist trade.

It was recommended that we conduct an in-depth employee survey with encouragement for honest candid input and assessment. This included their perception of management and customer inter-action and experience. An immediate fundamental change regarded tipping. Whereas the previous system was based on a joined tip jar, now each wait-staff member was tipped on his/her individual performance. From a western business perspective, this was a no- brainer. But in the 1990s, many businesses were still running from a Communist cultural mindset.

Benefits and Results: Employee turnover decreased by 82%, tips increased by 61%, return customers increased by 64% and profits increased by 58%.

Summary:
Here are some basic things to keep in mind for increased employee performance:
1. Encourage employee empowerment and responsibility
2. Develop processes designed to give your employees the ownership to take care of each customer as if they were their own personal guest.
3. Always look for ways to create respect, cooperation and harmony between staff and management
4. Weed out the poor performers and the culprits who bring toxic energy into the office environment.

Big banks and fees – here they go again

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011


In response to new rules that recently went into affect designed to insulate merchant’s excessive fees, Bank of America, and Chase have decided to shift the burden to their customers by having them pay a monthly 5.00 fee for the privilege of using their debit cards. And, just one swipe per month will do ya! Wells Fargo is also trying out a lower fee of 3.00.

In fairness to the banks it is important to point out that they have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to create a system that provides for debit card services. This investment included the technology and infrastructure to support required, to offer debit card convenience. Wal-Mart and Home Depot led the efforts to alleviate the cost to the merchants through legislation. I personally would have supported relief for merchants generating under fifty million annually.

Needless to say, the fees are being shifted AND because the big Banks have lost their credibility for goodwill – it is difficult to feel sorry for them. So let me reiterate, this is a charge levied against you for accessing your own money! So, let’s get this straight, first you get paid literally next to nothing for giving them your money to invest, then they charge you excessive credit card rates* for you to borrow (compare your APR to the current Prime rate for lending – even 8% is excessive)

Worse yet, many small business owners today are often sneered at by these guys at the idea of giving them a loan, or a decent line of credit.

Fee addition: How did we get to this?

For any of you old enough to remember, there was once a time Banks actually liked their customers. Rather than charging excessive interest rates on credit cards and loans, they actually paid decent rates for holding your money. Now of course, one hardly is paid anything at all (if anything) and for many, is expected to pay them to take your money.

Banks use to climb over one another to offer you a free toaster or microwave oven if you opened an account with them. Then came the ATMs. Suddenly they were offering additional incentives to get us all hooked on using ATMs. The banks also competed for bragging rights as to who actually had the most ATMs. Then the big push began to encourage consumers to use their ATM cards (soon to be renamed their debit or check cards. Of course all the incentivizing and bribing was not necessarily carried out to the benefit of the customer (as the banks would have you believe)

  • Labor savings – ATM machines kept their cost down by allowing banks to eliminate staff, which would have been previously required to manage those who needed to cash a check. In addition, automated withdrawals though ATMs also reduced human error through computerized record keeping.

As an added bonus, banks realized a financial bonanza in charging non-customers excessive fees to access their networks!

  • Debit Cards – As with ATMs, debit card use was incentivized to lower their cost of business under the guise promoting customer conveyance. Once again, it reduced the labor cost of constantly refilling their ATMs with cash. Better yet, removed another roadblock for a customer to spend money if they did not want to use their credit card. Now, the “I will need to write a check or withdrawal from the ATM” obstacle was eliminated.
  • Overdraft Fees – For years, banks enjoyed another money bonanza of offering overdraft protection for anyone who spent money without having an adequate balance. The majority of those affected were not intentionally over-drawing, they just neglected to double check for new fee’s banks were slipping in which affected their balances.

  • Fee’s are like heroin to banks – Senior Bankers I have spoken with actually confided that they have “fee committees” set up to think up new fees! It is an addiction for Banks to both make up and enforce them. Therefore, when they are taken away to the benefit of the consumer, well, the banks, like any heroin addicts, get upset!

Rather than placing focus on taking care of their customers and encouraging long-term satisfaction, Bank of America, Chase and Wells Fargo are moving forward with a plan to access fees for their customers who use their Debit Cards – and the continued war against their own customers grinds on. Well unless their customers wise up and move their money to a Bank or Credit Union that is not so fee addicted.

_______________________________________________________________________

What is expected and what needs to change

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Recently while in Central Europe, I pondered why all of the teenagers seem to smoke cigarettes? In fact, if they are to fit in, then they are expected to smoke.

It continues to fascinate me – even after living there and doing business throughout the region since 1995. Yes, even with all that, I am still fascinated by this cultural phenomenon.

Then upon returning to the states, I read about yet another “fee” the airlines were beginning to charge so that they could claim they offered low fares, only to offset the claim with adding on upwards of 50% additional in hidden fees and charges when the passenger arrives.

I opened my Sprint bill to see that the $89.95 “coverage plan” was really 105.00 after all the cr_ p they add on. No transparency there!

Finally, my call to the bank left me on hold for 38 minutes. I had a simple question but was advised that:

  1. I could go to www. bla bla bla (I just needed to clarify something with a real person)
  1. On the other hand, I could accept my fate and yes! “Continue to hold because my business is very important to them!!!!!” Oh yea, they did apologize for the delay – so that made me feel much better!

As I sat on hold, I reflected on my curious fascination over Czech teenagers smoking cigarettes and then realized the connection with lousy service here in The United States!

And here it is

Just as people in other countries are expected to smoke cigarettes as a rite of passage, we American consumers are expected to receive and tolerate terrible, abusive lousy service. Just as cigarettes will eventually kill scores of people in other countrys, the stress in dealing with large corporate conglomerates may eventually do the same to the American consumer.

Yes, it has become very clear that many businesses seem to almost compete on:

  1. Who can offer the worst customer service?
  2. Who can be the most deliberately misleading
  3. Who can come up with the most ways” to hit you in the pocketbook?”

As you may realize, new laws recently passed to make credit card statements more transparent. The law clearly stipulates that all new credit card statements must be easy to understand and yes, transparent. I laughed when recent ads began rolling out from Bank America, boasting, “They were dedicated to transparency”. Really? Why did it take them so long? (Please refer to comment #2.)

The bottom line is that on the most part, American consumers and small businesses put up with this. They accept it as the norm and we are expected to conform to it.

But here is the golden nugget:

Businesses that are well organized with a clear mission to customer service are in an ideal position to wrestle away a large conglomerates clientele. With a promise of good customer service, quality products and transparency that is real, they can, and will win over the masses!

Even better, once the word is out, the happy and delighted customers will do a lot of the advertising for you. Yes, it is true; offering exceptional customer service that demonstrates true appreciation to the customer should become the “expected norm.” In addition, we consumers and business owners alike have a responsibility to embrace it and expect it!